Thursday, January 11, 2007

More thoughts on Bush's "new plan" that doesn't seem new

Kevin Drum read through the President's speech and Highlights of the Iraq Strategy Review, and came to the made the following observations:
There were a number of things worth commenting on in Bush's speech tonight, but I guess the biggest thing that leapt out at me is also the simplest: he really didn't make even a cursory effort to pretend that he was doing anything truly new. There was nothing about new military tactics, just an assertion that more troops would help us clear and hold neighborhoods. There was nothing very serious about reducing sectarian tension, just a laundry list of proposed Iraqi legislation accompanied by some platitudes about Prime Minister Maliki accepting responsibility for his own country. And there was nothing substantial about broader regional initiatives, just the usual pro forma warnings delivered to Iran and Syria.

It took me a couple of minutes to digest this, but there's nothing even remotely new here at all. Almost to the letter, it's the same stuff we've been trying for the past three years, except with about 10% more troops than before. Does Bush really think the American public is going to find any of this very convincing?
Actually, Bush did not merely propose Iraqi legislation. He insisted that such legislation would be enacted.
To give every Iraqi citizen a stake in the country's economy, Iraq will pass legislation to share oil revenues among all Iraqis. To show that it is committed to delivering a better life, the Iraqi government will spend $10 billion of its own money on reconstruction and infrastructure projects that will create new jobs...And to allow more Iraqis to re-enter their nation's political life, the government will reform de-Baathification laws, and establish a fair process for considering amendments to Iraq's constitution.
(emphasis added). Up to this point, we have not been very successful in telling the Iraqi government what to do and having that government actually do it, now have we? What is going to be different this time? I ask that question with sincerity. I really would like an answer. I have not found one in the speech.

1 Comments:

Blogger WCharles said...

I have not thought about this matter in these terms, but you raise some good points.

"Look at the erosion of our rights as a result of the minimal amount of terrorism we have experienced."

I would maintain that some of that erosion has been unnecessary and used for purposes other than fighting terrorism. [My new tin foil hat is quite spiffy.]

"Our free society was based on the belief that the vast majority of us bought into the same core values..."

And Arab culture is very different from our own, and yet for some reason the Bush administration thought that Western-style democracy would simply be "plug and play" in the Arab world.

"The deviants outnumber the decent people in Iraq."

I'm not sure about this. Instead, it seems to me that through various means the "deviants" are able to manipulate circumstances and thus keep the goals of the decent people from being achieved. Then again, it could be that there are various groups of deviants that collectively outnumber those wanting a peaceful Iraq.

1/11/2007 2:24 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home